방사선종양학

본문글자크기
  • [PLoS One.] Variability in target delineation of cervical carcinoma: A Korean radiation oncology group study (KROG 15-06).

    2017년 04월호
    [PLoS One.] Variability in target delineation of cervical carcinoma: A Korean radiation oncology group study (KROG 15-06).

    울산의대 / 주지현, 김영석*

  • 출처
    PLoS One.
  • 등재일
    2017 Mar 16
  • 저널이슈번호
    12(3):e0173476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173476. eCollection 2017.
  • 내용

    바로가기  >


    Abstract

    PURPOSE:

    To determine inter-observer variability in target volume definition of cervical cancer in radical and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) settings.

     

    METHODS:

    Eight physicians contoured CTVs of 2 patients underwent definitive and postoperative RT. Each volume was analyzed using the individual/median volume ratio and generalized conformity index (CIgen). And center of mass (COM) of each contour was calculated. Expert agreement was quantified using an expectation maximization algorithm for Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE).

     

    RESULTS:

    For definitive RT, the individual/median volume ratio ranged from 0.51 to 1.41, and CIgen was 0.531. Mean 3-dimensional distances of average to each COM were 7.8 mm. For postoperative RT setting, corresponding values were 0.65-1.38, 0.563, and 5.3 mm. Kappa value of expert agreement was 0.65 and 0.67, respectively. STAPLE estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, and kappa measures of inter-physician agreement were 0.73, 0.98, and 0.65 for the definitive and 0.75, 0.98, and 0.67 for the adjuvant radiotherapy setting. The largest difference was observed in the superior-inferior direction, particularly in the upper vagina and the common iliac area.


    CONCLUSION:

    As there was still some variability in target delineation, more detailed guidelines for target volume delineation and continuing education would help to reduce this uncertainty.

     

    Author information

    Joo JH1, Kim YS1, Cho BC1, Jeong CY1, Park W2, Kim HJ3, Yoon WS4, Yoon MS5, Kim JY6, Choi JH7, Choi Y8, Kim JY9.

    Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

    Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

    Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

    Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.

    Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Jeollanam-do, Republic of Korea.

    Department of Radiation Oncology, the Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

    Department of Radiation Oncology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

    Department of Radiation Oncology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.

    Center for Uterine Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.

     

  • 연구소개
    근치적/수술 후 보조적 방사선치료를 받은 자궁경부암 증례(각 1예)에서 8명의 방사선종양학 전문의가 제시하는 치료영역(clinical target volume)의 차이를 정량적, 정성적으로 분석함. 어느 부위에서 전문의들 간의 치료영역의 차이가 가장 크게 발생하였는지 상하, 전후, 좌우의 방향 뿐만 아니라 해부학적 영역 측면에서 분석하여, 향후 치료영역 정의 시 주의해야할 부분을 강조함.
  • 낡은 찻잔

    축하합니다.

    덧글달기2017-04-05 12:15:34

  • 덧글달기
    덧글달기
       IP : 18.119.139.50

    등록